Examiner Ilya Traktovenko has allowed 117 of 165 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ilya Traktovenko maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Over 165 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 117 and abandoned 48, yielding an allowance rate of 71%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's pooled record across both art units. The 71% figure is a historical summary of outcomes already closed, not a prediction for any pending or future application.
This examiner's public record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate of 71% describes past outcomes and represents the historical ratio of allowances to total decided applications. Pooled figures do not isolate performance by individual art unit or predict results in any specific case. Each application is examined on its merits under applicable law.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 34 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ilya Traktovenko has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 165 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP