Examiner Imad Mutee Kassim has allowed 148 of 192 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Imad Mutee Kassim has a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 192 disposed applications, 148 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 77%. The examiner has handled 228 total applications, of which 44 were abandoned. This pooled record aggregates work across multiple art units and represents outcomes on decided cases only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This profile presents a pooled record—an aggregate of the examiner's work across 2 art units. Pooled figures describe past outcomes across different subject areas within TC 2100 and do not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome. An allowance rate calculated from decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) differs from a raw count of all filings and reflects only applications with final dispositions.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 81 decided applications with an interview and 58 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 26 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Imad Mutee Kassim has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 228 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP