Examiner Isaac Tuku Tecklu has allowed 797 of 948 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Isaac Tuku Tecklu has a public record of 948 disposed applications across 4 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 797 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 84%. The allowance rate varies across the art units served, ranging from 71% to 90%. This pooled figure represents the aggregated outcome of applications examined across multiple art units and does not characterize performance in any single art unit.
This record is pooled across multiple art units, meaning the 84% figure aggregates different subject areas and examining patterns. Pooled statistics describe historical outcomes across all art units combined and are not predictions about any specific application. To understand performance in a particular art unit, consult the per-art-unit breakdown. Aggregate figures reflect past results and do not indicate what will occur in future prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 235 decided applications with an interview and 227 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 203 without.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 65 decided applications with an interview and 160 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Isaac Tuku Tecklu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 948 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP