LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ISHAN NMN MOUNDI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 22 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi has allowed 4 of 22 decided applications (18%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

18% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans 68 total applications. Of 22 disposed applications, 4 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 18%. Additionally, 18 applications were abandoned. This allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending filings. The record represents aggregate outcomes across his assigned art units.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units where the examiner has been active. The allowance rate and disposition counts describe historical outcomes on decided applications and are not predictions about the outcome of any particular application. Aggregate figures across multiple art units mask variation within individual units. A separate section of this page may present per-art-unit detail, which can reveal variation not visible in pooled data.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2141
68 APPS · 18% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

18% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION4 / 18 / 46allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION33.1 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.2 moart unit avg 47.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility92% · art unit 49%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 91%
§112 — Written description & definiteness43%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi

  • What is Examiner Moundi's allowance rate?
    18% on 22 disposed applications (4 allowed, 18 abandoned). This rate reflects decided applications only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    One art unit (2141) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these pooled figures represent?
    Historical aggregate outcomes across all art units where the examiner has been active. They describe past disposition patterns, not projections for future applications.
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    68 total applications, of which 22 were disposed (decided). The remaining applications are pending.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP