Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi has allowed 4 of 22 decided applications (18%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans 68 total applications. Of 22 disposed applications, 4 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 18%. Additionally, 18 applications were abandoned. This allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending filings. The record represents aggregate outcomes across his assigned art units.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units where the examiner has been active. The allowance rate and disposition counts describe historical outcomes on decided applications and are not predictions about the outcome of any particular application. Aggregate figures across multiple art units mask variation within individual units. A separate section of this page may present per-art-unit detail, which can reveal variation not visible in pooled data.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ishan Nmn Moundi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP