Examiner Jack M Choules has allowed 95 of 111 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jack M Choules maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 111 disposed applications, he allowed 95 and abandoned 16, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. The allowance rate across his art units ranges from 81% to 90%, reflecting variation in the disposition of applications within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents the aggregate of his work across both art units and describes his historical record only.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units into a single overall figure. The 86% allowance rate reflects the combined outcomes of 111 decided applications across both art units. This aggregate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may show different rates; those figures appear separately. Pooled data provides context on the examiner's overall pattern but does not forecast any particular prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jack M Choules has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 111 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP