Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek has allowed 774 of 977 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jacob Andrew Petranek maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across his pooled record, 774 applications were allowed and 203 were abandoned, for a total of 977 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 79%, meaning that of the 977 decided applications, 79% resulted in allowance. Petranek's record spans a single art unit. The 1,027 total applications on file include pending matters not yet decided.
This profile aggregates Petranek's record across all art units in which he examines. The figures describe his historical record only—allowance rate, application counts, and disposition data—and are not predictions about any specific application outcome. Pooled data smooths variation across individual art units and provides an overview of past decisions. Individual art-unit breakdowns, where available, may show different patterns and are examined separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 319 decided applications with an interview and 658 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,027 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP