LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JACOB ANDREW PETRANEK
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 977 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek has allowed 774 of 977 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

79% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jacob Andrew Petranek maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across his pooled record, 774 applications were allowed and 203 were abandoned, for a total of 977 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 79%, meaning that of the 977 decided applications, 79% resulted in allowance. Petranek's record spans a single art unit. The 1,027 total applications on file include pending matters not yet decided.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Petranek's record across all art units in which he examines. The figures describe his historical record only—allowance rate, application counts, and disposition data—and are not predictions about any specific application outcome. Pooled data smooths variation across individual art units and provides an overview of past decisions. Individual art-unit breakdowns, where available, may show different patterns and are examined separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2183
1,027 APPS · 79% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines program control and execution.

79% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION774 / 203 / 50allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.4 moart unit avg 25 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.8 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility17% · art unit 34%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)72%
§103 — Obviousness85% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness36%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW84%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW77%+7 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 319 decided applications with an interview and 658 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek

  • What is Jacob Andrew Petranek's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 79% based on 977 disposed (decided) applications—774 allowed and 203 abandoned. This rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
  • How many art units does Petranek examine in?
    Petranek examines in one art unit (Art Unit 2183), all within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The allowance rate includes only decided applications (allowed and abandoned). The 1,027 total applications include pending matters not yet disposed, which are excluded from the rate calculation.
  • What technology areas does Petranek cover?
    Petranek examines applications in Technology Center 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jacob Andrew Petranek has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,027 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP