Examiner Jacob Lipman

What the data says.

Jacob Lipman's public record spans 1 art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 98 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 66%, reflecting 65 allowed applications and 33 abandoned applications. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record across all art units in this technology center and describes past outcomes only, not any individual application or future disposition.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units under this examiner's supervision. The 66% allowance rate and disposal count reflect cumulative outcomes across the entire portfolio. Aggregate historical figures describe what occurred in decided cases and do not constitute predictions about specific pending applications. Individual applications may proceed differently based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution conduct.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.

Questions about Examiner Jacob Lipman

• 01What is Jacob Lipman's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 66%, calculated over 98 disposed applications (65 allowed, 33 abandoned). This is the examiner's pooled historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Jacob Lipman's record covers 1 art unit (Art Unit 2134) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03Does this pooled allowance rate apply to my application?

  No. The 66% figure is a historical aggregate and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Allowance depends on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
• 04What technology does this examiner handle?

  Jacob Lipman works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.