Examiner Jacqueline Christine Meyer has allowed 11 of 16 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Jacqueline Christine Meyer has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 16 disposed applications, Meyer issued 11 allowances, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. Of the examiner's total 47 applications on record, 5 have been abandoned. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's historical record across decided cases and does not characterize any pending application or predict outcomes in any individual matter.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's purview and reports past dispositions. The 69% allowance rate describes 16 decided applications and reflects historical data only. Pooled figures do not account for differences in art units, applicant arguments, claim scope, or examiner assignment within a given prosecution. The statistic is correlational history, not predictive of any specific application's path or outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 47 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jacqueline Christine Meyer has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 47 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP