Examiner Jae Uk Jeon has allowed 686 of 791 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jae Uk Jeon maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 851 total applications, 791 have been disposed (decided). Of those disposed applications, 686 were allowed and 105 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 87%. This rate represents the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The examiner's work spans a single art unit.
This record aggregates the examiner's performance across all art units in TC 2100 into one pooled figure. The 87% allowance rate describes past decisions on disposed applications and does not constitute a prediction about any pending or future application. Aggregate statistics reflect historical performance; outcomes in any individual case depend on application-specific facts, claim scope, and prior art.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 469 decided applications with an interview and 322 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jae Uk Jeon has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 851 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP