Examiner Jake Timothy Breen has allowed 10 of 15 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jake Timothy Breen holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 15 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 67%. This figure reflects applications that were either allowed or abandoned; 42 total applications are on record, of which 10 were allowed and 5 abandoned. The remaining applications are either pending or in other dispositive states. The pooled allowance rate represents the examiner's historical record across decided cases and is not a prediction for any specific application.
This profile aggregates data from a single art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 67% describes past decisions on 15 disposed applications and reflects the examiner's historical record in that unit. Pooled figures describe what occurred, not what will occur in any future case. Individual applications may proceed differently based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history. The data is correlational; no causal relationship between any single factor and an allowance or rejection is implied.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jake Timothy Breen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP