Examiner James Gregory Pohlman has allowed 22 of 36 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
James Gregory Pohlman's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 36 decided applications, 22 were allowed and 14 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record across both art units and reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided. The record does not include pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units, presenting a single allowance rate that combines different subject areas within TC 2100. Aggregate historical figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions about any specific pending application. A pooled rate reflects the examiner's overall pattern across the art units covered, not the outcome of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 24 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Based on 12 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner James Gregory Pohlman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 36 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP