Examiner James R Turchen

What the data says.

James R Turchen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled allowance rate is 29% across 21 disposed applications. Of those decided cases, 6 were allowed and 15 were abandoned. His record spans a single art unit. This allowance rate reflects the historical outcome of applications he has examined; it describes past dispositions and is not predictive of any individual application's outcome.

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record aggregates decisions across all his assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 29% figure represents past outcomes on 21 decided applications and does not forecast the result of any specific case. Pooled data obscure variation among individual art units. Aggregate statistics describe historical patterns, not causation or prediction.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner James R Turchen

• 01What is James R Turchen's overall allowance rate?

  His pooled allowance rate is 29%, based on 21 disposed applications (6 allowed, 15 abandoned). This figure describes his historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2139), all within TC 2100.
• 03What does a 29% allowance rate mean?

  Of 21 applications decided by this examiner, 29% resulted in allowance. The rate reflects past outcomes and does not predict the outcome of any future or pending application.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.