LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JANE WEI BENNER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jane Wei Benner

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 380 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Jane Wei Benner has allowed 330 of 380 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

87% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2139 · 93%AU 2131 · 71%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jane Wei Benner has a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 380 disposed applications, she issued 330 allowances, resulting in an 87% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 71% to 93% across her art units. Her total application record includes 401 applications, with 50 abandonments. These figures reflect past dispositions and do not predict outcomes in any individual case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate describes historical disposal outcomes, not a forecast for any specific application. Allowance rates can vary by art unit; the range shown reflects that variation. Pooled statistics combine different technological areas and examination patterns and are correlational only—they describe what occurred, not what will occur in any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2139
296 APPS · 93% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

93% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION255 / 20 / 21allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.4 moart unit avg 24 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY26.1 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility15% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)87%
§103 — Obviousness84% · art unit 80%
§112 — Written description & definiteness58%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW96%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW89%+7 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 161 decided applications with an interview and 114 without.

ART UNIT 2131
105 APPS · 71% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

71% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 56%
DISPOSITION75 / 30 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.4 moart unit avg 26.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.4 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility25% · art unit 29%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)81%
§103 — Obviousness95% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness81%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW73%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW70%+3 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 57 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jane Wei Benner

  • What is Jane Wei Benner's overall allowance rate?
    87% across 380 disposed applications in her pooled record across TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    2 art units (2131 and 2139) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across her art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 71% to 93% across her art units. This pooled record combines all units.
  • Does this pooled rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. This is a historical aggregate. It describes past dispositions across multiple art units and does not forecast results for any individual case.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jane Wei Benner has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 401 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP