Examiner Jared Ian Rutz has allowed 376 of 458 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jared Ian Rutz maintains a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 458 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 376, yielding an 82% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 55% to 100% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and reflects historical disposition data. The record does not indicate future outcomes on any particular application.
This pooled record combines results from multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. The 82% figure represents the share of decided applications (allowed or abandoned) across all units where the examiner worked. Pooled statistics describe past outcomes and do not predict how any specific application will be examined or disposed. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from this aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 87 decided applications with an interview and 307 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Based on 29 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jared Ian Rutz has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 469 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP