Examiner Jared M Bibbee has allowed 675 of 810 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jared M Bibbee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 832 total applications, 810 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 810 disposed applications, 675 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. The record spans a single art unit (2161). This allowance rate reflects the examiner's pooled outcomes across decided cases and does not describe applications still pending.
This pooled record aggregates all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate (83%) is computed from allowed and abandoned applications only—pending cases are excluded. The figure describes what has occurred in the past and is a historical aggregate, not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application. Pooled rates across multiple art units reflect combined performance and do not isolate outcomes by subject matter within TC 2100.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 267 decided applications with an interview and 543 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jared M Bibbee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 832 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP