LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JASMINE THANH THAI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 27 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai has allowed 9 of 27 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

33% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jasmine Thanh Thai maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 61 total applications, 27 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 27 decided applications, 9 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 33 percent. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record pools all work across a single art unit within TC 2100. An allowance rate calculated from disposed applications describes what has occurred in the past, not what will occur on any future filing. Pooled figures aggregate different applications and reflect historical outcomes only. They are correlational data and are not predictive of the outcome of a specific application or a measure of how any particular claim will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2129
61 APPS · 33% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

33% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION9 / 18 / 34allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.4 moart unit avg 42.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility83% · art unit 63%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)98%
§103 — Obviousness88% · art unit 75%
§112 — Written description & definiteness86%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai

  • What is Jasmine Thanh Thai's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 33 percent, calculated from 9 allowed applications out of 27 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This examiner works in one art unit (Art Unit 2129) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these figures mean for my application?
    This pooled record describes past outcomes on 27 decided applications. Historical allowance rates are not predictions of outcomes on specific pending applications. Each application is examined on its individual merits.
  • How many applications has this examiner handled?
    The examiner's public record includes 61 total applications. Of these, 27 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned), and 18 have been abandoned. Applications with pending status are not included in the allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP