Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai has allowed 9 of 27 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jasmine Thanh Thai maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 61 total applications, 27 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 27 decided applications, 9 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 33 percent. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This examiner's record pools all work across a single art unit within TC 2100. An allowance rate calculated from disposed applications describes what has occurred in the past, not what will occur on any future filing. Pooled figures aggregate different applications and reflect historical outcomes only. They are correlational data and are not predictive of the outcome of a specific application or a measure of how any particular claim will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jasmine Thanh Thai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP