Examiner Jason B Bryan has allowed 334 of 410 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jason B Bryan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 432 total applications, 334 were allowed and 76 abandoned, yielding 410 decided applications. His allowance rate is 81% of those decided applications. The record spans a single art unit (2114), aggregating prosecution activity in one subject-matter area within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates all applications Bryan decided across his assigned art unit(s). The 81% allowance rate describes the ratio of allowed to decided applications in his past record and is a historical summary only. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes on any individual application and do not account for variation in application type, complexity, or amendment history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 74 decided applications with an interview and 336 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jason B Bryan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 432 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP