Examiner Jason D Cardone has allowed 14 of 29 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jason D Cardone has a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 29 disposed applications, 14 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 48% over the decided count. This pooled figure aggregates his record across all three art units and reflects historical outcomes on applications that reached final disposition. The record does not include pending applications.
This pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. Aggregate statistics describe the examiner's past record and reflect decisions already made on closed applications. They are historical data, not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from the pooled rate. Pooled figures are useful for understanding overall patterns but do not forecast outcomes on any particular filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jason D Cardone has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 29 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP