Examiner Jason G Liao

What the data says.

Jason G Liao has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 457 disposed applications, 298 were allowed and 159 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This figure represents decided applications only and does not include any pending matters. The record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100, pooling statistics from different examination areas into a single overall measure of historical disposition.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across 2 art units within the technology center. The 65% allowance rate describes past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications—and is calculated only from decided cases. Aggregate figures across multiple art units do not constitute a prediction for any specific application and reflect historical outcomes only. Individual art units may vary in their patterns and subject matter focus.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Jason G Liao

• 01What is Jason G Liao's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 65%, calculated from 298 allowed applications and 159 abandoned applications across 457 total disposed applications. This figure represents decided cases only and does not include pending matters.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The public record spans 2 art units (2156 and 2169) within Technology Center 2100. The pooled allowance rate aggregates outcomes across these art units.
• 03Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The 65% allowance rate describes historical disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. It is an aggregate measure across multiple art units and does not account for individual application facts or claim specifics.
• 04What does 'disposed applications' mean?

  Disposed applications are those that have reached a final decision—either allowed or abandoned. The 457 disposed applications exclude any applications still pending examination.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.