LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JASON MICHAEL PINGA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jason Michael Pinga

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 10 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Jason Michael Pinga has allowed 10 of 10 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

100% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jason Michael Pinga holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 37 total applications. Of the 10 disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned), 10 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 100%. No applications were abandoned. The allowance rate reflects only decided applications and does not include pending filings. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity across all art units in TC 2100.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's decisions across all assigned art units. The allowance rate of 100% describes the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the past and is a historical aggregate, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth variation across art units and technology areas. Each application is evaluated on its own merits under the patent statute.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2137
37 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 68%
DISPOSITION10 / 0 / 27allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.1 moart unit avg 25.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY22.2 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility52% · art unit 25%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)81%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 85%
§112 — Written description & definiteness59%

Based on 37 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jason Michael Pinga

  • What is Jason Michael Pinga's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 100%, based on 10 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned combined). This figure is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Jason Michael Pinga's public record covers one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    The pooled record includes 37 total applications. The allowance rate of 100% is calculated from the 10 disposed applications only; pending applications are excluded from the rate calculation.
  • What does the pooled record tell me?
    The pooled record shows aggregate historical decisions across the examiner's assigned art units. It reflects past outcomes and does not predict future results for any individual application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jason Michael Pinga has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 37 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP