Examiner Jason W Blust has allowed 369 of 431 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jason W Blust maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 431 decided applications, he has allowed 369, yielding an 86% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 83% to 95% across his art units. This pooled figure aggregates his record in Art Units 2132 and 2137 and describes his historical disposition pattern without predicting outcomes in any specific pending or future application.
This pooled record combines allowance data across multiple art units within TC 2100, producing a single aggregate allowance rate. Pooled figures describe past decisions in decided applications and are not predictions for any individual case. Art-unit-specific rates may differ from the overall pooled rate. Aggregate statistics reflect historical patterns only and carry no predictive force for any particular application's examination or outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 154 decided applications with an interview and 175 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 54 decided applications with an interview and 48 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jason W Blust has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 470 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP