LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JAWEED A ABBASZADEH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jaweed A Abbaszadeh

TECH CENTER 2100 · 4 ART UNITS · 421 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 4 ART UNITS

Examiner Jaweed A Abbaszadeh has allowed 335 of 421 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

80% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2115 · 81%AU 2176 · 89%AU 2118 · 57%AU 2187 · 60%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jaweed A Abbaszadeh maintains a public record across 4 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 421 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 80%. The allowance rate across these art units ranges from 57% to 89%, reflecting variation in outcomes across the different art units in which the examiner maintains a record. This pooled figure aggregates decisions from multiple art units and represents the historical disposition of applications decided by this examiner.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's allowance data across multiple art units into a single overall figure. The 80% rate shown here is the combined result of decisions across 4 different art units. This aggregate statistic describes past outcomes and is not a prediction for any individual application. The range (57% to 89%) shows that allowance rates vary by art unit; pooled figures do not indicate how any specific application will be decided.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2115
344 APPS · 81% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.

81% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 81%
DISPOSITION279 / 65 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.7 moart unit avg 25.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.7 moart unit avg 36.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility19% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)68%
§103 — Obviousness61% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness47%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW92%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW77%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 92 decided applications with an interview and 252 without.

ART UNIT 2176
45 APPS · 89% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

89% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION33 / 4 / 8allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.1 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY33.7 moart unit avg 40.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility47% · art unit 41%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)91%
§103 — Obviousness78% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness69%

Based on 45 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2118
30 APPS · 57% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
57% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION17 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.3 moart unit avg 22.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.1 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 30%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)67%
§103 — Obviousness61% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness44%

Based on 30 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2187
10 APPS · 60% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

60% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION6 / 4 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.8 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.9 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility38% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)88%
§103 — Obviousness63% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness75%

Based on 10 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jaweed A Abbaszadeh

  • What is Jaweed A Abbaszadeh's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 80%, calculated across 421 decided applications pooled from all 4 art units in the record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner maintains a public record in 4 art units: 2115, 2118, 2176, and 2187, all within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 57% to 89% across the examiner's art units, indicating that outcomes vary by art unit. A detailed breakdown by individual art unit is available in a separate section.
  • What does this pooled record mean for my application?
    This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates vary by art unit and application facts; past rates do not determine future decisions.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jaweed A Abbaszadeh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 429 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP