Examiner Jay A Morrison has allowed 780 of 976 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jay A Morrison maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 976 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 80%, reflecting 780 allowed and 196 abandoned applications. The allowance rate ranges from 75% to 94% across the art units in which the examiner has maintained a substantial record. This record is pooled across all three art units and does not attribute specific rates to individual units.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units and reflects historical disposition of applications decided. The figures presented—allowance rate, art-unit count, and the range across units—describe past outcomes and are correlational in nature. An aggregate allowance rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior art encountered within individual units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 312 decided applications with an interview and 318 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 95 decided applications with an interview and 65 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 99 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jay A Morrison has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,017 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP