Examiner Jay Michael White has allowed 2 of 9 decided applications (22%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jay Michael White's pooled public record spans 1 art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 52 total applications, 9 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 9 decided applications, 2 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 22%. The record reflects dispositions in a single art unit; figures are aggregated and describe past outcomes only, not predictions for any specific application.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units where an examiner works. The allowance rate (22% here) is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. This aggregate figure describes the examiner's historical record and does not predict outcomes in any particular application. Art-unit-level records, when available separately, may show variation.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jay Michael White has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 52 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP