Examiner Jay Young Jung has allowed 23 of 61 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jay Young Jung holds a public record of 61 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided cases, 23 were allowed and 38 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 38% across the disposed applications. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that reached final disposition; it does not include pending cases.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across one art unit. The allowance rate of 38% describes past decisions on disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation within individual art units and across different claim types, technologies, or prosecution histories. Historical statistics describe correlations in the record, not causation or what will occur in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 36 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jay Young Jung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP