Examiner Jayprakash N Gandhi

What the data says.

Jayprakash N Gandhi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 254 disposed applications, 237 were allowed and 17 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 93%. This figure represents a pooled record spanning one art unit. The record reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; applications pending or in other procedural states are excluded from this calculation. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 93% describes past outcomes on decided cases and reflects the composition and resolution of that specific caseload. Aggregate figures do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior art across individual cases. The pooled rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not isolate factors affecting any particular prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Jayprakash N Gandhi

• 01What is the overall allowance rate for Examiner Gandhi?

  The allowance rate is 93%, based on 254 disposed applications (237 allowed, 17 abandoned).
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  The record covers one art unit (2125) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The rate reflects past outcomes on a specific caseload and is not a prediction of any individual application's disposition.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  Applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.