Examiner Jean B Fleurantin has allowed 794 of 926 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jean B Fleurantin maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 926 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 794, yielding an 86% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 86% across these art units. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from multiple examining areas and does not represent performance in any single art unit or predict results in any particular application.
A pooled record combines data from multiple art units into a single aggregate. The overall allowance rate (86% here) reflects past decisions across all art units together and describes historical outcomes only. Aggregate figures do not account for differences among individual art units and are not predictions for any specific application. To understand variation by art unit, consult the detailed per-art-unit breakdown.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 222 decided applications with an interview and 681 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jean B Fleurantin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 926 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP