LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JEANETTE J PARKER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jeanette J Parker

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 353 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2025
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Jeanette J Parker has allowed 225 of 353 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

64% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2175 · 62%AU 2179 · 79%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Jeanette J Parker maintains a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 353 decided applications, 225 were allowed, yielding a 64% allowance rate. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 62% to 79%. This pooled figure reflects the aggregate outcome of applications decided in both art units and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate (64% over 353 decided applications) represents a historical aggregate and describes past dispositions only. Allowance rates vary by art unit; individual art-unit records are published separately. Aggregate figures are descriptive of prior outcomes and are not predictions about any specific pending or future application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2175
315 APPS · 62% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

62% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION195 / 120 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.2 moart unit avg 22.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.4 moart unit avg 37.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility42% · art unit 30%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)80%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness69%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW73%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW47%+26 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 177 decided applications with an interview and 138 without.

ART UNIT 2179
38 APPS · 79% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
79% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION30 / 8 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION14.2 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.6 moart unit avg 43.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility18% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness68%

Based on 38 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jeanette J Parker

  • What is Examiner Parker's overall allowance rate?
    64% across 353 decided applications (225 allowed, 128 abandoned), pooled across all of the examiner's art units in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    2 art units (2175 and 2179), both within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 62% to 79% across the examiner's art units. Separate, detailed records for each individual art unit are available in the per-art-unit section.
  • Is this pooled rate a prediction for my application?
    No. This figure describes the examiner's past record of decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeanette J Parker has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 353 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP