Examiner Jeffrey Andrew Yang has allowed 31 of 36 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jeffrey Andrew Yang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and comprises 53 total applications. Of 36 disposed applications, 31 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. Five applications were abandoned. The record reflects outcomes across decided cases in TC 2100 and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's assignment. The allowance rate of 86% describes historical outcomes on 36 decided applications and is not a prediction of the outcome for any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation across different art units within TC 2100. This data describes the examiner's past record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 16 decided applications with an interview and 20 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeffrey Andrew Yang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP