Examiner Jeffrey C Pwu has allowed 64 of 96 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jeffrey C Pwu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 96 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 67%, with 64 applications allowed and 32 abandoned. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2143). This pooled figure represents the ratio of allowed to all decided applications and does not constitute a prediction of the outcome of any specific application.
This record aggregates Examiner Pwu's applications across all art units in TC 2100 into one pooled allowance rate. The 67% figure describes past dispositions only and reflects the proportion of allowed to decided applications over the examiner's full portfolio. Pooled rates combine different art units and do not predict the result of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 76 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeffrey C Pwu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 96 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP