Examiner Jeison C Arcos has allowed 364 of 457 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Jeison C Arcos maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 457 disposed applications, 364 were allowed and 93 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 80%. This pooled figure reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record covers a single art unit, aggregating all dispositions within that unit's scope.
This pooled record aggregates all dispositions across one art unit and presents a historical allowance rate. The 80% figure describes past outcomes on 457 decided applications and is not a prediction of the outcome on any specific application under examination. Pooled data obscures variation within individual art units and does not forecast prosecution results in any particular case or technology area.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 112 decided applications with an interview and 345 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeison C Arcos has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 457 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP