LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JENNIFER N WELCH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jennifer N Welch

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 565 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Jennifer N Welch has allowed 410 of 565 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

73% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2195 · 84%AU 2143 · 40%AU 2127 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jennifer N Welch maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning three art units: 2127, 2143, and 2195. Across 565 decided applications, her allowance rate is 73%. The record reflects 410 allowed applications and 155 abandoned applications. The allowance rate varies across her art units, ranging from 40% to 84%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across all three art units and represents her historical record in this technology center.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's outcomes across multiple art units into a single allowance figure. This aggregate describes the examiner's past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range (40% to 84%) shows that allowance rates differ among the art units represented in this record. The pooled rate reflects historical performance only and does not predict results for any individual case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2195
420 APPS · 84% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines program control and execution.

84% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION352 / 68 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.1 moart unit avg 33.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY58.2 moart unit avg 48.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility48% · art unit 49%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)24%
§103 — Obviousness75% · art unit 93%
§112 — Written description & definiteness56%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW97%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW74%+23 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 176 decided applications with an interview and 244 without.

ART UNIT 2143
170 APPS · 40% ALLOWANCE
40% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 52%
DISPOSITION57 / 87 / 26allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.5 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.8 moart unit avg 45.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility63% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)86%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 94%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW63%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW26%+37 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 92 without.

ART UNIT 2127
1 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION1 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.6 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCYart unit avg 41.8 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jennifer N Welch

  • What is Jennifer N Welch's overall allowance rate?
    Her allowance rate is 73%, calculated from 410 allowed and 155 abandoned applications across 565 decided cases.
  • How many art units does she examine in?
    She has a public record in three art units (2127, 2143, and 2195) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does her allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. Allowance rates across her art units range from 40% to 84%. The pooled rate of 73% represents all three units combined and does not identify rates by individual unit.
  • What does this pooled record represent?
    This is a historical summary of her decisions across all art units in TC 2100. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jennifer N Welch has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 591 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP