Examiner Jenq-Kang Chu has allowed 53 of 140 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Jenq-Kang Chu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 140 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 53 and abandoned 87, yielding an allowance rate of 38% over decided cases. The examiner's practice spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all examined applications within that art unit over the period covered by the public database.
This examiner's record is pooled across one art unit, aggregating all disposed applications in TC 2100. The 38% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation within individual art units and do not account for application-specific factors such as claim scope, prior art, or prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 83 decided applications with an interview and 57 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jenq-Kang Chu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 140 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP