Examiner Jensen Hu has allowed 400 of 577 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jensen Hu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. Over 598 total applications, 400 were allowed and 177 were abandoned, yielding 577 disposed applications. The allowance rate across these decided applications stands at 69%. This figure represents the proportion of allowed applications among all applications with final dispositions—neither pending nor withdrawn applications are included in this calculation. The pooled record aggregates activity within the art unit and reflects historical outcomes only.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's purview. The allowance rate reported here is a historical aggregate and describes past outcomes on decided applications only. It is not a prediction of outcome for any specific pending application. Individual art units may show different rates. Aggregate figures provide context on the examiner's overall record but do not account for variation in case complexity, claim scope, prior art, or applicant arguments on any particular matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 292 decided applications with an interview and 285 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jensen Hu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 598 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP