Examiner Jeremiah L Avery

What the data says.

Jeremiah L Avery maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 59 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 20 and abandoned 39. The allowance rate is 34% over this decided count. The examiner's record spans one art unit. These figures represent the examiner's pooled record and describe applications already decided; they do not constitute a prediction about any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record aggregates decisions across one art unit. The pooled allowance rate of 34% reflects outcomes on 59 completed applications and describes past decisions only. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes on specific applications. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from the pooled figure and warrant review for applications in particular technical areas.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Jeremiah L Avery

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 34%, calculated over 59 disposed applications (20 allowed, 39 abandoned). This rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2131) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled record include?

  The pooled record aggregates all decisions across the examiner's art unit assignments. It reflects 59 total disposed applications and does not distinguish outcomes by individual art unit or subject area.
• 04Can this rate predict my application's outcome?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Applications differ in scope, claims, prior art, and prosecution history.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.