Examiner Jeremy D Engelskirchen has allowed 16 of 46 decided applications (35%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jeremy D Engelskirchen maintains a public record across three art units (2157, 2168, 2169) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 46 disposed applications, his allowance rate stands at 35%. Of the decided applications, 16 were allowed and 30 were abandoned. This allowance rate reflects the pooled outcomes across all three art units in which he maintains an active record.
This record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100 and represents the examiner's historical outcomes on decided applications. The allowance rate is a summary statistic of past dispositions and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation across art units; detail on individual art-unit records is available separately. Historical rates describe what occurred, not what will occur in any future case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 19 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeremy D Engelskirchen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP