Examiner Jeremy L Stanley has allowed 142 of 287 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jeremy L Stanley has a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 287 disposed applications, 142 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 49%. The allowance rate ranges from 39% to 72% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record within TC 2100. The examiner has handled 327 total applications, of which 145 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and describes past dispositions, not outcomes in any specific case.
This record is pooled across multiple art units within TC 2100 and represents historical disposal data. An aggregate allowance rate describes what occurred across all art units combined and is not predictive of any individual application's outcome. The range (39% to 72%) shows that allowance rates differ among the examiner's art units. Pooled figures are useful context for understanding an examiner's overall record but do not indicate how any particular application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 127 decided applications with an interview and 71 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 44 decided applications with an interview and 28 without.
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jeremy L Stanley has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 327 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP