Examiner Jermaine A Mincey has allowed 300 of 519 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jermaine A Mincey maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 519 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 58%, reflecting 300 allowed applications and 219 abandonments. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 40% to 63%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and represents the historical record of decided applications.
A pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. This figure describes the examiner's past record across all assigned art units and is not a prediction for any specific application. Because the examiner works across different art units with potentially different subject matter and rejection patterns, the aggregate rate masks variation. The provided range shows the breadth of allowance rates across individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 271 decided applications with an interview and 99 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 35 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jermaine A Mincey has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 556 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP