Examiner Jerome Anthony Klosterman Ii has allowed 15 of 18 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jerome Anthony Klosterman II maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 18 applications, of which 15 were allowed and 3 were abandoned. This results in an allowance rate of 83% over the decided applications. The examiner's total caseload spans 49 applications. The 83% allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided cases—allowed plus abandoned—and does not represent a share of all pending filings. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record across all art units under their jurisdiction.
This record pools all applications across the examiner's art units into a single aggregate profile. The 83% allowance rate describes past decisions (allowed and abandoned applications) and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics reflect historical patterns but do not forecast results in individual cases. Pooled data masks variation among different art units; a separate section of this page details performance within each art unit separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jerome Anthony Klosterman Ii has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP