LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JESSE DAVID DILLER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jesse David Diller

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 91 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION DEC 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Jesse David Diller has allowed 76 of 91 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

84% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jesse David Diller maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across the pooled record, 91 applications have been disposed of (decided), comprising 76 allowed and 15 abandoned. The allowance rate is 84% over the 91 decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, meaning this pooled figure represents work in one art unit only. Decided applications exclude any applications still pending. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner. This profile covers a single art unit. The allowance rate (84% over 91 decided applications) describes the examiner's past dispositions and reflects historical patterns only. Aggregate figures do not forecast outcomes for individual applications. Each application stands on its own merits under patent law. A pooled rate is a snapshot of past decisions, not a causal indicator of how any future application will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2187
91 APPS · 84% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

84% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION76 / 15 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.9 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.8 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW87%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW83%+4 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 15 decided applications with an interview and 76 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jesse David Diller

  • What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?
    The allowance rate is 84%, calculated from 76 allowed applications out of 91 total decided applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2187), all within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The allowance rate describes the examiner's past record only and is not a prediction for any specific application. Each application is examined on its own facts and merits under patent statute.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 91 applications total: 76 allowed and 15 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jesse David Diller has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 91 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP