Examiner Jesse P Frumkin has allowed 90 of 136 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jesse P Frumkin holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 136 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 90 and abandoned 46, for an allowance rate of 66%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects past dispositions only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's work across one art unit. The figures describe decisions already made—allowed and abandoned applications—and do not forecast the result of any new filing. Aggregate statistics characterize historical performance but remain correlational data; they are not predictions for individual cases or indicators of how any particular application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 96 decided applications with an interview and 40 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jesse P Frumkin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 136 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP