Examiner Jessica N Le has allowed 400 of 551 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jessica N Le has a pooled allowance rate of 73% across 551 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her public record spans three art units: 2157, 2161, and 2169. Of 575 total applications, 400 were allowed and 151 were abandoned. The allowance rate varies across her art units, ranging from 49% to 79%. This aggregate figure reflects her combined record across all three art units and describes her historical decisions rather than any outcome on a specific application.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This overall 73% rate is the combined result across all three units and reflects past decisions. Aggregate statistics describe historical patterns and do not function as predictions for individual applications. Art-unit allowance rates may differ meaningfully from the pooled average, and applicants may find per-unit data in the art-unit section of this profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 123 decided applications with an interview and 198 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 84 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 43 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jessica N Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 575 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP