LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JESSICA THUY PHAM
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jessica Thuy Pham

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 6 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Jessica Thuy Pham has allowed 1 of 6 decided applications (17%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

17% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jessica Thuy Pham's public record spans 49 total applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 6 disposed applications, 1 was allowed and 5 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 17% over the decided count. The examiner works within a single art unit. This record reflects past dispositions and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units an examiner handles. The allowance rate shown here—17% of decided applications—describes historical dispositions and reflects the mix of art units, application types, and examination stages in the examiner's caseload. Aggregate figures characterize past record only and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
49 APPS · 17% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

17% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION1 / 5 / 43allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.1 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility85% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)98%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness78%

Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jessica Thuy Pham

  • What is Jessica Thuy Pham's allowance rate?
    Over 6 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 17% (1 allowed, 5 abandoned). This is a historical measure and not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Jessica Thuy Pham's record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2121) in TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record show?
    The pooled record aggregates all dispositions across the examiner's art units. The 17% allowance rate is computed from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and reflects the cumulative history, not a prediction for any new filing.
  • Why does the total differ from the disposed count?
    Of 49 total applications, 6 have been disposed (decided as allowed or abandoned). The remaining applications are pending or in other states and are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jessica Thuy Pham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP