Examiner Ji H Bae has allowed 791 of 958 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ji H Bae maintains a public record across 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 958 disposed applications, 791 were allowed, for a pooled allowance rate of 83%. This aggregate figure spans art units 2115, 2118, 2176, and 2187. The allowance rate varies across these art units, ranging from 77% to 96%. The examiner's total application count is 1,002, with 167 abandoned applications. This pooled record reflects outcomes across multiple subject areas within TC 2100.
This record aggregates applications and outcomes across four art units, each with potentially different subject matter and application volumes within TC 2100. The 83% allowance rate is a historical average over decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Pooled statistics mask variation among individual art units; the range of 77% to 96% illustrates this diversity. Aggregate figures describe past performance and are independent of any particular prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 150 decided applications with an interview and 370 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 145 decided applications with an interview and 109 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 83 decided applications with an interview and 44 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 19 decided applications with an interview and 38 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ji H Bae has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,002 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP