Examiner Jian Huang has allowed 43 of 101 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jian Huang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), encompassing one art unit. Across 101 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 43%, with 43 allowed and 58 abandoned. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's overall record across decided cases. The allowance rate is calculated as a percentage of disposed applications only, excluding any pending matters. This snapshot represents the examiner's historical performance in the technology center and does not apply to any individual pending application.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate and disposed count describe what has occurred in the past and are historical facts only. Pooled figures do not isolate performance by art unit, subject matter variation, or application complexity. Aggregate statistics are not predictions of outcomes in any specific case and do not account for individual claim scope, prosecution history, or prior art circumstances.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 54 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jian Huang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 101 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP