Examiner Jieying Tang has allowed 93 of 137 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Jieying Tang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 137 disposed applications, 93 were allowed and 44 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. This figure represents the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The examiner works across one art unit. This record is a historical aggregate and does not forecast outcomes for any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates all decisions across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate—68% of decided cases—describes past dispositions only and is not a prediction for any specific application. Pooled figures represent an overall summary; individual cases vary based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history. Aggregate statistics describe the record, not the likelihood of allowance in any particular matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 74 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jieying Tang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 137 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP