Examiner Jigar P Patel has allowed 576 of 699 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jigar P Patel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 729 total applications, 576 have been allowed and 123 abandoned, yielding 699 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 82% of decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all work in this technology center and does not forecast results on any individual application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 82% describes past dispositions across decided applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction of future outcomes on specific filings. Pooled records combine different subject areas and application types, so individual case outcomes may vary from the aggregate figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 165 decided applications with an interview and 534 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jigar P Patel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 729 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP