Examiner Jing-Yih Shyu has allowed 541 of 628 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jing-Yih Shyu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 628 applications. Of those decided applications, 541 were allowed and 87 were abandoned, resulting in an allowance rate of 86%. This record reflects the examiner's overall patenting history in TC 2100 and is pooled across all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction.
This record aggregates the examiner's performance across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 86% describes the examiner's past record on decided applications only—those marked allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending filings. Pooled figures do not vary by art unit and are historical data, not predictions about any individual application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 252 decided applications with an interview and 376 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jing-Yih Shyu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 628 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP