Examiner Jinsong Hu has allowed 108 of 155 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jinsong Hu maintains a public record of 155 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Of those disposed applications, 108 were allowed and 47 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 70%. The 70% allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in this examiner's pooled record across the single art unit. This figure is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 70% describes what has occurred in past disposed applications, pooled together. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Different art units within the technology center cover distinct subject matter; the pooled rate masks variation among them. A separate section of this page displays per-art-unit detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jinsong Hu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 155 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP