Examiner John C Park has allowed 37 of 75 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
John C Park holds a public record of 75 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), across 2 art units. Of those 75 decided applications, 37 were allowed and 38 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 49%. The allowance rate across his art units ranges from 48% to 52%. This pooled figure aggregates his record across all art units in TC 2100 and describes past dispositions only.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's allowance rates across multiple art units into a single historical figure. The 49% rate shown here represents all 75 decided applications across both art units combined. This aggregate describes what occurred in the past and is not a prediction about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 33 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John C Park has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 75 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP